Scroll through any health feed and makhana (fox nuts) shows up with the same label: superfood. It is on snack
packs, in diet plans and in wellness videos. But a label is not evidence. So instead of repeating the claim, we
tested it: we took the six things people most often say about makhana and checked each one against a peer-
reviewed laboratory and human study, a 2023 scientific review of the plant, and official nutrition guidance.
The short answer: makhana is a genuinely good snack with a few well-measured strengths. Whether it is a
“superfood” depends on what that word is supposed to mean, which is where we start.
First, What Does “Superfood” Actually Mean?
Here is the surprise: nobody has an official definition. Researchers at Germany’s federal risk-assessment agency
(BfR) point out that “superfood” has no legal definition in the European Union, which is why products can be
marketed under the word with very different levels of evidence behind them. The term describes marketing, nota scientific category.
That changes the question. We cannot confirm or deny a title that has no rules. What we can do is check the
specific health claims that make people call makhana a superfood, one at a time.
How We Checked
Our main evidence is a 2022 open-access study in Food Production, Processing and Nutrition. Researchers
analysed roasted and unroasted fox nuts in the lab and tested the glycemic response of roasted fox nuts in
human volunteers. We also used a 2023 review in the journal Molecules that catalogues the plant’s chemistry and the pharmacology studies published so far, and the U.S. National Institutes of Health fact sheet on magnesium for dietary context. We did not use commercial nutrition websites or apps.
CLAIM 1 “Makhana is rich in protein.”
In the laboratory analysis, roasted fox nuts contained 14.57% crude protein, up from 11.40% in the unroasted nuts. Part of that rise is simply concentration: roasting drives off water, so everything else makes up a larger share of the weight. The authors note the figure is in the same range as walnuts, hazelnuts and pistachios (13.7– 17.1%) and higher than chestnuts. They also cite an Indian government research centre report (ICAR, Darbhanga) putting the quality of makhana protein, measured by its essential amino acid index, at 89–93%.
CLAIM 2 “Makhana is a low-fat, light snack.”
Half of this is solidly true. Roasted fox nuts contained about 0.68% fat, whereas the authors note that nuts and seeds range from roughly 1.9% to 66.5% fat. That extremely low fat content is the single most distinctive thing about makhana.
But “low fat” is not “low calorie.” The same study calculated the energy density of roasted fox nuts at about 382 kcal per 100 g, up from 350 kcal before roasting, because roasting removes water and packs more food into each gram. Makhana is light in the hand and still carries calories, mostly from carbohydrate (the study reports about 79% carbohydrate in roasted nuts).
CLAIM 3 “Makhana has a low glycemic index.”
This is the best-evidenced claim and the only one tested directly in people. Using the international standard (ISO) method, the researchers gave ten healthy adults aged 18–30 either a glucose drink or a portion of roasted fox nuts (33 g, supplying 25 g of available carbohydrate) and tracked blood glucose over two hours. The glycemic index came out at 37%, which falls in the low category (below 55). For context, the authors list popcorn at 55–89 and potato crisps at 57 in a widely used international GI table.
CLAIM 4 “Makhana is packed with minerals like calcium and magnesium.”
Makhana does contain them. In roasted nuts the study measured about 263 μg of magnesium and 192 μg of calcium per gram, which works out to roughly 26 mg of magnesium and 19 mg of calcium per 100 g. But when the authors compared against the published values for almonds, cashews, pistachios, walnuts and macadamias, those nuts contained significantly more potassium, magnesium, phosphorus and calcium. Makhana came out ahead mainly on iron.
For scale, the NIH lists recommended daily magnesium intake at 400–420 mg for men and 310–320 mg for
women. A 30 g handful of roasted makhana would supply roughly 8 mg, about 2–3% of that. Helpful, but not what most people would call “packed.”
CLAIM 5 “Makhana is full of antioxidants.”
Lab tests do show antioxidant activity, and roasting increased it. Total phenolics rose from about 346 to 471 mg per 100 g, and the DPPH radical-scavenging reading rose from 48.5% to 79.1%. Compared with figures published for other nuts, roasted fox nuts had more phenolics than macadamias, cashews, Brazil nuts and almonds, but fewer than pistachios and walnuts, and fewer flavonoids than cashews, almonds and pistachios.
Two cautions. First, those comparisons use numbers from different laboratories, so they are indicative rather than exact. Second, an antioxidant reading in a test tube is not proof of a benefit in the body. The authors themselves add that roasting creates new browning compounds that also register in these tests, and they call for more research.
CLAIM 6 “Makhana helps prevent or treat diabetes, heart disease or cancer.”
This is where the “superfood” story runs ahead of the science. Makhana has a long history in traditional
medicine; the 2023 review lists Chinese herbal texts dating back to the Han dynasty (about 2,000 years ago) as well as Ayurvedic and Unani use. But tradition is not a clinical trial.
The modern studies the review tabulates are cell-culture and animal experiments: diabetic rats and mice, a
rodent heart-injury model, and cancer cell lines. Many of them used concentrated extracts, and a number used the seed shell, not the white popped kernel that people actually eat. The review describes these as promising leads for future research. In the sources we examined, we did not find human trials showing that eating makhana prevents or treats any of these diseases.
So, Is Makhana a Superfood?
If “superfood” means a food that is nutritious, low in fat, low on the glycemic index and satisfying to eat,
makhana earns it comfortably. If it means a food with proven power to prevent disease, no food has earned
that, makhana included.
The honest description is a better one for a brand to own anyway: a naturally low-fat, protein-containing, low- glycemic snack, backed by a peer-reviewed lab analysis and a human glycemic trial. That statement is specific, checkable and defensible. For packaging and ads, remember that health claims in India are regulated, so check any wording with a food-regulatory adviser before it goes on a pack.

